Kasada vs Visitor Filters
Kasada vs Visitor Filters, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Kasada is on 58/100 and Visitor Filters on 24/100.
Where each one leads
Kasada
- our overall score: 58/100 against 24/100
- agent readiness: 65/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 66/100 against 5/100
Visitor Filters
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Kasada | Visitor Filters |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Kasada protects websites, mobile apps, and APIs from automated attacks with real-time threat detection. | Protects websites from bots, scrapers, and malicious traffic with real-time IP filtering and geo-blocking. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, API Security, Bot Mitigation | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Web Security, Bot Mitigation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | Not published |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Silistra, Bulgaria |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Kasada | Visitor Filters |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 120 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -15.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $99.9M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,860 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Kasada | Visitor Filters |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 24/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | Not published | 25/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 12/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 35/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (65/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 5/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Kasada | Visitor Filters |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Alpinejs, Tailwind CSS |
What users say
| Measure | Kasada | Visitor Filters |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 2 votes |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 1 negative across 2 threads | Not published |
“Bypass Kasada. Hi fellow web scrapers, I wrote a script in Playwright (Python) that automates a login process on https://sportsbet.com.au . This script runs headless and works perfectly fine on my Windows host machine. However, when I run t”r/webscraping
Kasada vs Visitor Filters: common questions
Which is better, Kasada or Visitor Filters?
On our 0-100 score Kasada rates higher (58/100 against 24/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Kasada and Visitor Filters compare on the numbers?
Kasada leads on our overall score (58/100 against 24/100), agent readiness (65/100 against 54/100), domain rating (66/100 against 5/100).
What do real users say about Kasada and Visitor Filters?
Kasada: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/webscraping.
Read the full Kasada review and pricing or the Visitor Filters review and pricing. You can also browse other Kasada alternatives we track.