Kando vs Shayp
Kando vs Shayp, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Kando is on 62/100 and Shayp on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Kando
- our overall score: 62/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 50 against 21
- funding raised: $36.0M against $1.5M
- LinkedIn following: 6,902 against 4,773
Shayp
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 45/100 against 31/100
At a glance
| Measure | Kando | Shayp |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Data intelligence platform leveraging real-time wastewater quality data for public health and environmental improvement. | AI-driven water monitoring company |
| Category | Industrial, Water, IoT, Sensor | Climate Tech, Water Technology, Water Treatment, Sustainability |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Brussels, Belgium |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Kando | Shayp |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 50 | 21 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -15.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $36.0M | $1.5M |
| Latest round | Series C | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,902 | 4,773 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Kando | Shayp |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 44/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 31/100 | 45/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Kando | Shayp |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Kando vs Shayp: common questions
Which is better, Kando or Shayp?
On our 0-100 score Kando rates higher (62/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Kando and Shayp compare on the numbers?
Kando leads on our overall score (62/100 against 48/100), headcount (50 against 21), funding raised ($36.0M against $1.5M), LinkedIn following (6,902 against 4,773). Shayp leads on agent readiness (42/100 against 21/100), domain rating (45/100 against 31/100).
Read the full Kando review and pricing or the Shayp review and pricing. You can also browse other Kando alternatives we track.