Kando vs Setpoint
Kando vs Setpoint, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Kando is on 62/100 and Setpoint on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Kando
- our overall score: 62/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 31/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 50 against 24
- headcount growth: -15.1% against -23.6%
- funding raised: $36.0M against $8.7M
- LinkedIn following: 6,902 against 1,452
Setpoint
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 21/100
At a glance
| Measure | Kando | Setpoint |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Data intelligence platform leveraging real-time wastewater quality data for public health and environmental improvement. | Automating indoor climate intelligence for commercial buildings using AI and deep learning. |
| Category | Industrial, Water, IoT, Sensor | Smart Home, Climate, Sensor, Climate Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2011 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Kando | Setpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 50 | 24 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -15.1% | -23.6% |
| Total funding | $36.0M | $8.7M |
| Latest round | Series C | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,902 | 1,452 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Kando | Setpoint |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 31/100 | 22/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Kando | Setpoint |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Self Managed |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Kando vs Setpoint: common questions
Which is better, Kando or Setpoint?
On our 0-100 score Kando rates higher (62/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Kando and Setpoint compare on the numbers?
Kando leads on our overall score (62/100 against 55/100), domain rating (31/100 against 22/100), headcount (50 against 24), headcount growth (-15.1% against -23.6%), funding raised ($36.0M against $8.7M), LinkedIn following (6,902 against 1,452). Setpoint leads on agent readiness (41/100 against 21/100).
Read the full Kando review and pricing or the Setpoint review and pricing. You can also browse other Kando alternatives we track.