Kagi vs Quant
Kagi vs Quant, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Kagi is on 53/100 and Quant on 41/100.
Where each one leads
Kagi
- our overall score: 53/100 against 41/100
Quant
- agent readiness: 28/100 against 22/100
- funding raised: $10.0M against $2.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Kagi | Quant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A personalized, privacy-focused, ad-free subscription search engine that puts users first. | A privacy-focused European search engine. |
| Category | Internet, Search Engine, Artificial Intelligence, SaaS | Search Engine, Privacy, AI Search Engine, Web Search |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2G |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, United States | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Kagi | Quant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 31 | Not published |
| Total funding | $2.5M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $1.1B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Kagi | Quant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 41/100 |
| Traction | 47/100 | 35/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 2/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (28/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Kagi | Quant |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Svelte, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Kagi vs Quant: common questions
Which is better, Kagi or Quant?
On our 0-100 score Kagi rates higher (53/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Kagi and Quant compare on the numbers?
Kagi leads on our overall score (53/100 against 41/100). Quant leads on agent readiness (28/100 against 22/100), funding raised ($10.0M against $2.5M).
Read the full Kagi review and pricing or the Quant review and pricing. You can also browse other Kagi alternatives we track.