K Health vs Spencer Health Solutions
K Health vs Spencer Health Solutions, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: K Health is on 63/100 and Spencer Health Solutions on 40/100.
Where each one leads
K Health
- our overall score: 63/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 64/100 against 3/100
- funding raised: $372M against $10.5M
Spencer Health Solutions
- agent readiness: 31/100 against 26/100
At a glance
| Measure | K Health | Spencer Health Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | K Health is an AI-driven primary care company providing 24/7 virtual healthcare solutions to millions in the U.S. | Remote patient monitoring and virtual care solutions for chronic disease management. |
| Category | HealthTech, Telemedicine, Primary Care, Virtual Care | HealthTech, MedTech, Telemedicine, Remote Patient Monitoring |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Chicago, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | K Health | Spencer Health Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 380 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +5.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $372M | $10.5M |
| Latest round | Series G | Series A |
| Valuation | $900M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 50,830 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | K Health | Spencer Health Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 40/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 35/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 50/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (26/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 3/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | K Health | Spencer Health Solutions |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
K Health vs Spencer Health Solutions: common questions
Which is better, K Health or Spencer Health Solutions?
On our 0-100 score K Health rates higher (63/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do K Health and Spencer Health Solutions compare on the numbers?
K Health leads on our overall score (63/100 against 40/100), domain rating (64/100 against 3/100), funding raised ($372M against $10.5M). Spencer Health Solutions leads on agent readiness (31/100 against 26/100).
Read the full K Health review and pricing or the Spencer Health Solutions review and pricing. You can also browse other K Health alternatives we track.