K Health vs mPulse
K Health vs mPulse, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: K Health is on 63/100 and mPulse on 56/100.
Where each one leads
K Health
- our overall score: 63/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 26/100 against 21/100
- funding raised: $372M against $31.0M
- LinkedIn following: 50,830 against 10,992
mPulse
- headcount: 632 against 380
At a glance
| Measure | K Health | mPulse |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | K Health is an AI-driven primary care company providing 24/7 virtual healthcare solutions to millions in the U.S. | Personalized mobile engagement platform for healthcare providers. |
| Category | HealthTech, Telemedicine, Primary Care, Virtual Care | HealthTech, MedTech, Patient Engagement, Digital Health |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Mateo, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | K Health | mPulse |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 380 | 632 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +5.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $372M | $31.0M |
| Latest round | Series G | Series B |
| Valuation | $900M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 50,830 | 10,992 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | K Health | mPulse |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (26/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 60/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | K Health | mPulse |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
K Health vs mPulse: common questions
Which is better, K Health or mPulse?
On our 0-100 score K Health rates higher (63/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do K Health and mPulse compare on the numbers?
K Health leads on our overall score (63/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (26/100 against 21/100), funding raised ($372M against $31.0M), LinkedIn following (50,830 against 10,992). mPulse leads on headcount (632 against 380).
Read the full K Health review and pricing or the mPulse review and pricing. You can also browse other K Health alternatives we track.