JUX vs Port
JUX vs Port, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: JUX is on 35/100 and Port on 64/100.
Where each one leads
JUX
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Port
- our overall score: 64/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 70/100 against 11/100
- headcount: 511 against 2
- headcount growth: +144.8% against -43.8%
- LinkedIn following: 22,660 against 613
At a glance
| Measure | JUX | Port |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Code-based design tool for building real products in production. | Developer portal and experience platform for modern engineering teams. |
| Category | Enterprise, Design, Development, Enterprise Software | Enterprise, DevOps, Development, Developer Tools |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | JUX | Port |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 511 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -43.8% | +144.8% |
| Total funding | Not published | $62.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 613 | 22,660 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | JUX | Port |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 35/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 5/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 11/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | JUX | Port |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Segment, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | Not detected | Intercom, HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
JUX vs Port: common questions
Which is better, JUX or Port?
On our 0-100 score Port rates higher (64/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do JUX and Port compare on the numbers?
Port leads on our overall score (64/100 against 35/100), domain rating (70/100 against 11/100), headcount (511 against 2), headcount growth (+144.8% against -43.8%), LinkedIn following (22,660 against 613).
Read the full JUX review and pricing or the Port review and pricing. You can also browse other JUX alternatives we track.