Jungo Connectivity vs Seeing Machines
Jungo Connectivity vs Seeing Machines, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Jungo Connectivity is on 56/100 and Seeing Machines on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Jungo Connectivity
- our overall score: 56/100 against 50/100
Seeing Machines
- domain rating: 58/100 against 50/100
- headcount: 425 against 45
- funding raised: $260M against $13.5M
- LinkedIn following: 16,639 against 6,877
At a glance
| Measure | Jungo Connectivity | Seeing Machines |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Automotive software company providing in-cabin driver monitoring and PC driver development tools. | Develops advanced driver monitoring systems (DMS) for automotive safety and driver behavior analysis. |
| Category | Automotive, In-Car Monitoring, Automotive Software, Driver Monitoring Systems | Automotive Technology, Computer Vision, Driver Monitoring Systems, ADAS |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware, software, services |
| Founded | 1998 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Canberra, Australia |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Jungo Connectivity | Seeing Machines |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 45 | 425 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -23.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $13.5M | $260M |
| Latest round | Not published | Secondary Market |
| Valuation | $35.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,877 | 16,639 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Jungo Connectivity | Seeing Machines |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 24/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 50/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Jungo Connectivity | Seeing Machines |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
Jungo Connectivity vs Seeing Machines: common questions
Which is better, Jungo Connectivity or Seeing Machines?
On our 0-100 score Jungo Connectivity rates higher (56/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Jungo Connectivity and Seeing Machines compare on the numbers?
Jungo Connectivity leads on our overall score (56/100 against 50/100). Seeing Machines leads on domain rating (58/100 against 50/100), headcount (425 against 45), funding raised ($260M against $13.5M), LinkedIn following (16,639 against 6,877).
Read the full Jungo Connectivity review and pricing or the Seeing Machines review and pricing. You can also browse other Jungo Connectivity alternatives we track.