JumpCloud vs Ping Identity
JumpCloud vs Ping Identity, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: JumpCloud is on 68/100 and Ping Identity on 60/100.
Where each one leads
JumpCloud
- our overall score: 68/100 against 60/100
- funding raised: $404M against $111M
Ping Identity
- headcount: 2,370 against 979
- LinkedIn following: 160,033 against 92,228
At a glance
| Measure | JumpCloud | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud directory platform for identity and device management. | Provider of identity security solutions for the digital enterprise. |
| Category | Identity & Access Management (IAM), Identity & Access Management, Endpoint Security, Cloud Security | Identity & Access Management (IAM), Cybersecurity, Identity & Access Management, Authentication |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2012 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | Louisville, United States | Denver, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | JumpCloud | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 979 | 2,370 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +21.9% |
| Total funding | $404M | $111M |
| Latest round | Series F | Series D |
| Valuation | $2.6B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 92,228 | 160,033 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | JumpCloud | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 50/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 43/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 82/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | JumpCloud | Ping Identity |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
JumpCloud vs Ping Identity: common questions
Which is better, JumpCloud or Ping Identity?
On our 0-100 score JumpCloud rates higher (68/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do JumpCloud and Ping Identity compare on the numbers?
JumpCloud leads on our overall score (68/100 against 60/100), funding raised ($404M against $111M). Ping Identity leads on headcount (2,370 against 979), LinkedIn following (160,033 against 92,228).
Read the full JumpCloud review and pricing or the Ping Identity review and pricing. You can also browse other JumpCloud alternatives we track.