Julia vs ScyllaDB
Julia vs ScyllaDB, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Julia is on 61/100 and ScyllaDB on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Julia
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
ScyllaDB
- our overall score: 67/100 against 61/100
- funding raised: $101M against $15.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Julia | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A high-performance, dynamic programming language for technical computing. | ScyllaDB is a high-performance, low-latency NoSQL database for data-intensive applications, designed to scale with modern infrastructure. |
| Category | Programming Languages, High-Performance Computing, Data Science, Machine Learning | Database, Enterprise, NoSQL, NoSQL Database |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Waltham, USA | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Julia | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 225 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +13.6% |
| Total funding | $15.0M | $101M |
| Latest round | Series A | Debt |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 28,743 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Julia | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 36/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 13/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Julia | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Fastly | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Plausible | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot, Discourse |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Julia | ScyllaDB |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | 0 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads |
“The Julia Language Subreddit. Julia is a high-level, high-performance dynamic programming language for technical computing, with syntax that is familiar to users of other technical computing environments.”r/
“My custom RDBMS is 588,235x faster than ScyllaDB on my laptop with fsync on executing a complex HTAP query.”r/Database
Julia vs ScyllaDB: common questions
Which is better, Julia or ScyllaDB?
On our 0-100 score ScyllaDB rates higher (67/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Julia and ScyllaDB compare on the numbers?
ScyllaDB leads on our overall score (67/100 against 61/100), funding raised ($101M against $15.0M).
What do real users say about Julia and ScyllaDB?
Julia: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track. ScyllaDB: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Database.
Read the full Julia review and pricing or the ScyllaDB review and pricing. You can also browse other Julia alternatives we track.