Jones vs Landa
Jones vs Landa, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Jones is on 62/100 and Landa on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Jones
- our overall score: 62/100 against 52/100
- domain rating: 39/100 against 34/100
- headcount: 220 against 36
- headcount growth: +49.7% against -9.2%
- LinkedIn following: 11,750 against 6,006
Landa
- agent readiness: 38/100 against 26/100
- funding raised: $95.0M against $32.1M
At a glance
| Measure | Jones | Landa |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Software automating risk and compliance workflows for real estate owners, property managers, and construction. | Real estate investing app enabling fractional ownership of properties through technology. |
| Category | Real Estate, Commercial Property, Insurance, Compliance | Real Estate, Investing, Proptech, Fintech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2016 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Jones | Landa |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 220 | 36 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +49.7% | -9.2% |
| Total funding | $32.1M | $95.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 11,750 | 6,006 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Jones | Landa |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 40/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (26/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 39/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Jones | Landa |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Mixpanel, PostHog, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Jones vs Landa: common questions
Which is better, Jones or Landa?
On our 0-100 score Jones rates higher (62/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Jones and Landa compare on the numbers?
Jones leads on our overall score (62/100 against 52/100), domain rating (39/100 against 34/100), headcount (220 against 36), headcount growth (+49.7% against -9.2%), LinkedIn following (11,750 against 6,006). Landa leads on agent readiness (38/100 against 26/100), funding raised ($95.0M against $32.1M).
Read the full Jones review and pricing or the Landa review and pricing. You can also browse other Jones alternatives we track.