Jitterbit vs make.com
Jitterbit vs make.com, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Jitterbit is on 70/100 and make.com on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Jitterbit
- our overall score: 70/100 against 63/100
- LinkedIn following: 121,306 against 13
make.com
- domain rating: 90/100 against 73/100
- headcount: 709 against 431
At a glance
| Measure | Jitterbit | make.com |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) for connecting cloud and on-premises applications. | Visual platform to build and automate workflows across thousands of apps without code. |
| Category | iPaaS, Integration Platform, API Management, Workflow Automation | iPaaS, Workflow Automation, Integration Platform, No-Code Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2004 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Oakland, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Jitterbit | make.com |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 431 | 709 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +500.0% |
| Total funding | $103M | $100M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 121,306 | 13 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Jitterbit | make.com |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | 36/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 13/100 |
| Search visibility | 92/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Jitterbit | make.com |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Jitterbit | make.com |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Visual Workflow Builder, Extensive App Integrations, Advanced Logic & Error Handling, Data Transformation Tools, Real-time Monitoring & Logging, Blueprint & Template Library |
What users say
| Measure | Jitterbit | make.com |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 1 vote |
Jitterbit vs make.com: common questions
Which is better, Jitterbit or make.com?
On our 0-100 score Jitterbit rates higher (70/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Jitterbit and make.com compare on the numbers?
Jitterbit leads on our overall score (70/100 against 63/100), LinkedIn following (121,306 against 13). make.com leads on domain rating (90/100 against 73/100), headcount (709 against 431).
Read the full Jitterbit review and pricing or the make.com review and pricing. You can also browse other Jitterbit alternatives we track.