JFrog vs Portshift
JFrog vs Portshift, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: JFrog is on 64/100 and Portshift on 55/100.
Where each one leads
JFrog
- our overall score: 64/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 2,427 against 6
- funding raised: $220M against $12.0M
- LinkedIn following: 100,512 against 1,438
Portshift
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | JFrog | Portshift |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | JFrog provides a DevOps platform for building, managing, and distributing software from developer to device. | Cloud-native security and compliance platform for DevOps teams. |
| Category | DevOps, Enterprise, Development, Software Supply Chain | DevOps, Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Kubernetes |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2008 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | JFrog | Portshift |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,427 | 6 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +18.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $220M | $12.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 100,512 | 1,438 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | JFrog | Portshift |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 12/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 57/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (58/100) | Not published |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | JFrog | Portshift |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | JFrog | Portshift |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 1 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“I am/was a proponent of jfrog artifactory for small to middle (50 people) companies i contracted for. To install the self-hosted version for the following reasons: As a cache for artifacts (docker, maven, rpm, others) to put less stress on ”r/devops
JFrog vs Portshift: common questions
Which is better, JFrog or Portshift?
On our 0-100 score JFrog rates higher (64/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do JFrog and Portshift compare on the numbers?
JFrog leads on our overall score (64/100 against 55/100), headcount (2,427 against 6), funding raised ($220M against $12.0M), LinkedIn following (100,512 against 1,438).
What do real users say about JFrog and Portshift?
JFrog: 1 positive and 1 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/devops.
Read the full JFrog review and pricing or the Portshift review and pricing. You can also browse other JFrog alternatives we track.