Kinexys (formerly Onyx by J.P. Morgan) vs Mambu
Kinexys (formerly Onyx by J.P. Morgan) vs Mambu, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Kinexys (formerly Onyx by J.P. Morgan) is on 10/100 and Mambu on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Kinexys (formerly Onyx by J.P. Morgan)
- agent readiness: 37/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 88/100 against 71/100
Mambu
- our overall score: 67/100 against 10/100
At a glance
| Measure | Kinexys (formerly Onyx by J.P. Morgan) | Mambu |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | J.P. Morgan's institutional blockchain platform for tokenization, cross-border payments, and financial asset settlement. | The composable, API-first cloud banking platform. |
| Category | Fintech, Blockchain, Payments | Fintech, Banking, Cloud Computing, Payments |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2020 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Berlin, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Kinexys (formerly Onyx by J.P. Morgan) | Mambu |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 766 |
| Total funding | Not published | $444M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series E |
| Valuation | Not published | $4.9B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 90,530 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Kinexys (formerly Onyx by J.P. Morgan) | Mambu |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 10/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 88/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Kinexys (formerly Onyx by J.P. Morgan) | Mambu |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Not detected | Netlify |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Kinexys (formerly Onyx by J.P. Morgan) vs Mambu: common questions
Which is better, Kinexys (formerly Onyx by J.P. Morgan) or Mambu?
On our 0-100 score Mambu rates higher (67/100 against 10/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Kinexys (formerly Onyx by J.P. Morgan) and Mambu compare on the numbers?
Kinexys (formerly Onyx by J.P. Morgan) leads on agent readiness (37/100 against 33/100), domain rating (88/100 against 71/100). Mambu leads on our overall score (67/100 against 10/100).
Read the full Kinexys (formerly Onyx by J.P. Morgan) review and pricing or the Mambu review and pricing. You can also browse other Kinexys (formerly Onyx by J.P. Morgan) alternatives we track.