Irregular vs Runlayer
Irregular vs Runlayer, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Irregular is on 70/100 and Runlayer on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Irregular
- our overall score: 70/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 64/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 46 against 30
- funding raised: $168M against $22.0M
- LinkedIn following: 4,452 against 3,155
Runlayer
- agent readiness: 61/100 against 48/100
At a glance
| Measure | Irregular | Runlayer |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Frontier security lab building defenses to uncover and secure advanced AI before release. | Securely connects AI to enterprise systems with threat detection and access control. |
| Category | AI Safety, AI Alignment, Frontier AI Lab, Foundation Model | Security, Agentic AI, AI Governance, AI Safety |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Irregular | Runlayer |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 46 | 30 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +203.8% |
| Total funding | $168M | $22.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Seed |
| Valuation | $450M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,452 | 3,155 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Irregular | Runlayer |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 36/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | C (61/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Irregular | Runlayer |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Framer | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Irregular | Runlayer |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Frontier AI Security, Vulnerability Discovery & Mitigation, AI Model Evaluation, Confidential AI Inference Systems | Not published |
Irregular vs Runlayer: common questions
Which is better, Irregular or Runlayer?
On our 0-100 score Irregular rates higher (70/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Irregular and Runlayer compare on the numbers?
Irregular leads on our overall score (70/100 against 54/100), domain rating (64/100 against 55/100), headcount (46 against 30), funding raised ($168M against $22.0M), LinkedIn following (4,452 against 3,155). Runlayer leads on agent readiness (61/100 against 48/100).
Read the full Irregular review and pricing or the Runlayer review and pricing. You can also browse other Irregular alternatives we track.