IRONSCALES vs ML Dome
IRONSCALES vs ML Dome, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: IRONSCALES is on 60/100 and ML Dome on 29/100.
Where each one leads
IRONSCALES
- our overall score: 60/100 against 29/100
- agent readiness: 67/100 against 21/100
- headcount: 178 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 20,509 against 23
ML Dome
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | IRONSCALES | ML Dome |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | IRONSCALES protects organizations from advanced phishing attacks using a combination of AI and human insights. | Cloud-based email security protecting Gmail and Office 365 from business email compromise. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Incident Response, Threat Detection | Cybersecurity, Email Security, Threat Detection, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | IRONSCALES | ML Dome |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 178 | 2 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $93.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,509 | 23 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | IRONSCALES | ML Dome |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 29/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 5/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 17/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (67/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | IRONSCALES | ML Dome |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Fastly |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot, Zendesk | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | IRONSCALES | ML Dome |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“Ironscales. This is the subreddit for Ironscales users, partners, and cybersecurity professionals who are passionate about stopping phishing attacks before and after delivery. We’re building a smarter, faster, more resilient approach to ema”r/
IRONSCALES vs ML Dome: common questions
Which is better, IRONSCALES or ML Dome?
On our 0-100 score IRONSCALES rates higher (60/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do IRONSCALES and ML Dome compare on the numbers?
IRONSCALES leads on our overall score (60/100 against 29/100), agent readiness (67/100 against 21/100), headcount (178 against 2), LinkedIn following (20,509 against 23).
What do real users say about IRONSCALES and ML Dome?
IRONSCALES: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full IRONSCALES review and pricing or the ML Dome review and pricing. You can also browse other IRONSCALES alternatives we track.