IRONSCALES vs Mimecast
IRONSCALES vs Mimecast, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: IRONSCALES is on 60/100 and Mimecast on 55/100.
Where each one leads
IRONSCALES
- our overall score: 60/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 67/100 against 48/100
Mimecast
- domain rating: 91/100 against 68/100
- headcount: 2,441 against 178
- funding raised: $239M against $93.5M
At a glance
| Measure | IRONSCALES | Mimecast |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | IRONSCALES protects organizations from advanced phishing attacks using a combination of AI and human insights. | Global cybersecurity company specializing in email security and human risk management. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Incident Response, Threat Detection | Cybersecurity, Email Security, Risk Management, Data Protection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2003 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | IRONSCALES | Mimecast |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 178 | 2,441 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +14.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $93.5M | $239M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series E |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 20,509 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | IRONSCALES | Mimecast |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 65/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (67/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 68/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | IRONSCALES | Mimecast |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot, Zendesk | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | IRONSCALES | Mimecast |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“Ironscales. This is the subreddit for Ironscales users, partners, and cybersecurity professionals who are passionate about stopping phishing attacks before and after delivery. We’re building a smarter, faster, more resilient approach to ema”r/
IRONSCALES vs Mimecast: common questions
Which is better, IRONSCALES or Mimecast?
On our 0-100 score IRONSCALES rates higher (60/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do IRONSCALES and Mimecast compare on the numbers?
IRONSCALES leads on our overall score (60/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (67/100 against 48/100). Mimecast leads on domain rating (91/100 against 68/100), headcount (2,441 against 178), funding raised ($239M against $93.5M).
What do real users say about IRONSCALES and Mimecast?
IRONSCALES: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track.
Read the full IRONSCALES review and pricing or the Mimecast review and pricing. You can also browse other IRONSCALES alternatives we track.