IonQ vs Quantum Machines
IonQ vs Quantum Machines, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: IonQ is on 41/100 and Quantum Machines on 68/100.
Where each one leads
IonQ
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 54/100
- headcount: 1,252 against 302
- LinkedIn following: 82,276 against 31,433
Quantum Machines
- our overall score: 68/100 against 41/100
- funding raised: $293M against $10.0M
At a glance
| Measure | IonQ | Quantum Machines |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | IonQ is a leader in quantum computing, developing powerful quantum computers for various industries. | Builds the Quantum Orchestration Platform (QOP) to accelerate quantum computing development and deployment. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, AI Hardware, AI Chip, Foundation Model | Quantum Computing, Quantum Hardware, Quantum Software, AI Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | College Park, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | IonQ | Quantum Machines |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,252 | 302 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +27.4% |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $293M |
| Valuation | Not published | $700M |
| LinkedIn followers | 82,276 | 31,433 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | IonQ | Quantum Machines |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 54/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | IonQ | Quantum Machines |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
IonQ vs Quantum Machines: common questions
Which is better, IonQ or Quantum Machines?
On our 0-100 score Quantum Machines rates higher (68/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do IonQ and Quantum Machines compare on the numbers?
IonQ leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 25/100), domain rating (74/100 against 54/100), headcount (1,252 against 302), LinkedIn following (82,276 against 31,433). Quantum Machines leads on our overall score (68/100 against 41/100), funding raised ($293M against $10.0M).
Read the full IonQ review and pricing or the Quantum Machines review and pricing. You can also browse other IonQ alternatives we track.