IonQ vs QEDMA
IonQ vs QEDMA, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: IonQ is on 41/100 and QEDMA on 56/100.
Where each one leads
IonQ
- domain rating: 74/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 1,252 against 40
- LinkedIn following: 82,276 against 5,017
QEDMA
- our overall score: 56/100 against 41/100
- funding raised: $40.7M against $10.0M
At a glance
| Measure | IonQ | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | IonQ is a leader in quantum computing, developing powerful quantum computers for various industries. | Israeli startup developing quantum noise resilience software to improve quantum computing. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, AI Hardware, AI Chip, Foundation Model | Quantum Computing, Quantum Error Correction, Quantum Software, Operating System |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | College Park, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | IonQ | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,252 | 40 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +31.2% |
| Open roles | Not published | 4 |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $40.7M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 82,276 | 5,017 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | IonQ | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | IonQ | QEDMA |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
IonQ vs QEDMA: common questions
Which is better, IonQ or QEDMA?
On our 0-100 score QEDMA rates higher (56/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do IonQ and QEDMA compare on the numbers?
IonQ leads on domain rating (74/100 against 52/100), headcount (1,252 against 40), LinkedIn following (82,276 against 5,017). QEDMA leads on our overall score (56/100 against 41/100), funding raised ($40.7M against $10.0M).
Read the full IonQ review and pricing or the QEDMA review and pricing. You can also browse other IonQ alternatives we track.