IonQ vs Oxford Quantum Circuits
IonQ vs Oxford Quantum Circuits, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: IonQ is on 41/100 and Oxford Quantum Circuits on 55/100.
Where each one leads
IonQ
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 53/100
- headcount: 1,252 against 148
- LinkedIn following: 82,276 against 36,202
Oxford Quantum Circuits
- our overall score: 55/100 against 41/100
- funding raised: $430M against $10.0M
At a glance
| Measure | IonQ | Oxford Quantum Circuits |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | IonQ is a leader in quantum computing, developing powerful quantum computers for various industries. | Building and deploying quantum computers. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, AI Hardware, AI Chip, Foundation Model | Quantum Computing, Deep Tech, Hardware, Cloud Computing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | College Park, United States | Oxford, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | IonQ | Oxford Quantum Circuits |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,252 | 148 |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $430M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 82,276 | 36,202 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | IonQ | Oxford Quantum Circuits |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 41/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | IonQ | Oxford Quantum Circuits |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment | Hotjar |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
IonQ vs Oxford Quantum Circuits: common questions
Which is better, IonQ or Oxford Quantum Circuits?
On our 0-100 score Oxford Quantum Circuits rates higher (55/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do IonQ and Oxford Quantum Circuits compare on the numbers?
IonQ leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 36/100), domain rating (74/100 against 53/100), headcount (1,252 against 148), LinkedIn following (82,276 against 36,202). Oxford Quantum Circuits leads on our overall score (55/100 against 41/100), funding raised ($430M against $10.0M).
Read the full IonQ review and pricing or the Oxford Quantum Circuits review and pricing. You can also browse other IonQ alternatives we track.