Intruder vs Tenable
Intruder vs Tenable, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Intruder is on 60/100 and Tenable on 46/100.
Where each one leads
Intruder
- our overall score: 60/100 against 46/100
Tenable
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 73/100
- funding raised: $300M against $63.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Intruder | Tenable |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Attack surface management company. | A leading cybersecurity company providing exposure management solutions for cloud, vulnerability, and identity security. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Attack Surface Management, Vulnerability Management, Penetration Testing | Cybersecurity, SaaS, Cloud Security, Vulnerability Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2002 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Columbia, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Intruder | Tenable |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 84 | Not published |
| Total funding | $63.0M | $300M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,752 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Intruder | Tenable |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 46/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 49/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Intruder | Tenable |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | PostHog, Plausible | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Intercom | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Intruder vs Tenable: common questions
Which is better, Intruder or Tenable?
On our 0-100 score Intruder rates higher (60/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Intruder and Tenable compare on the numbers?
Intruder leads on our overall score (60/100 against 46/100). Tenable leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 44/100), domain rating (84/100 against 73/100), funding raised ($300M against $63.0M).
Read the full Intruder review and pricing or the Tenable review and pricing. You can also browse other Intruder alternatives we track.