Intruder vs Rapid7
Intruder vs Rapid7, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Intruder is on 60/100 and Rapid7 on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Intruder
- our overall score: 60/100 against 55/100
Rapid7
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 44/100
- domain rating: 83/100 against 73/100
- headcount: 3,275 against 84
- LinkedIn following: 223,367 against 5,752
At a glance
| Measure | Intruder | Rapid7 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Attack surface management company. | Cybersecurity solutions provider focused on vulnerability management, detection, and response. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Attack Surface Management, Vulnerability Management, Penetration Testing | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Vulnerability Management, Application Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Boston, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Intruder | Rapid7 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 84 | 3,275 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +1.8% |
| Total funding | $63.0M | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series D |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,752 | 223,367 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Intruder | Rapid7 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 59/100 |
| Search visibility | 49/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Intruder | Rapid7 |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | PostHog, Plausible | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Intercom | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Intruder | Rapid7 |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 2 negative across 6 threads |
“Our penetration team contractor recommended that we go with Rapid7, we had a quick demo with them and from what I've seen everything that they have seems pretty robust. Was wondering if there was anyone who has used Rapid7 in the field and ”r/cybersecurity
Intruder vs Rapid7: common questions
Which is better, Intruder or Rapid7?
On our 0-100 score Intruder rates higher (60/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Intruder and Rapid7 compare on the numbers?
Intruder leads on our overall score (60/100 against 55/100). Rapid7 leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 44/100), domain rating (83/100 against 73/100), headcount (3,275 against 84), LinkedIn following (223,367 against 5,752).
What do real users say about Intruder and Rapid7?
Rapid7: 1 positive and 2 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/cybersecurity.
Read the full Intruder review and pricing or the Rapid7 review and pricing. You can also browse other Intruder alternatives we track.