Intruder vs Pentera
Intruder vs Pentera, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Intruder is on 60/100 and Pentera on 68/100.
Where each one leads
Intruder
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Pentera
- our overall score: 68/100 against 60/100
- headcount: 487 against 84
- funding raised: $175M against $63.0M
- LinkedIn following: 93,381 against 5,752
At a glance
| Measure | Intruder | Pentera |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Attack surface management company. | Automated security validation platform to continuously test and reduce cyber exposure. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Attack Surface Management, Vulnerability Management, Penetration Testing | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Penetration Testing, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Intruder | Pentera |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 84 | 487 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +14.1% |
| Total funding | $63.0M | $175M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series D |
| Valuation | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,752 | 93,381 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Intruder | Pentera |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 49/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 79/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Intruder | Pentera |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | PostHog, Plausible | Not detected |
| Support stack | Intercom | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Intruder vs Pentera: common questions
Which is better, Intruder or Pentera?
On our 0-100 score Pentera rates higher (68/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Intruder and Pentera compare on the numbers?
Pentera leads on our overall score (68/100 against 60/100), headcount (487 against 84), funding raised ($175M against $63.0M), LinkedIn following (93,381 against 5,752).
Read the full Intruder review and pricing or the Pentera review and pricing. You can also browse other Intruder alternatives we track.