Intruder vs Luchs Security
Intruder vs Luchs Security, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Intruder is on 60/100 and Luchs Security on 70/100.
Where each one leads
Intruder
- agent readiness: 44/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 18/100
- headcount: 84 against 7
- LinkedIn following: 5,752 against 253
Luchs Security
- our overall score: 70/100 against 60/100
- funding raised: $2.6B against $63.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Intruder | Luchs Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Attack surface management company. | Automated security testing platform for the automotive industry, ensuring regulatory compliance and product security. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Attack Surface Management, Vulnerability Management, Penetration Testing | Cybersecurity, Automotive, Testing, Embedded Systems |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Intruder | Luchs Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 84 | 7 |
| Total funding | $63.0M | $2.6B |
| Latest round | Series B | Accelerator/Incubator |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,752 | 253 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Intruder | Luchs Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 9/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 49/100 | 26/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 18/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Intruder | Luchs Security |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | PostHog, Plausible | Not detected |
| Support stack | Intercom | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Intruder vs Luchs Security: common questions
Which is better, Intruder or Luchs Security?
On our 0-100 score Luchs Security rates higher (70/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Intruder and Luchs Security compare on the numbers?
Intruder leads on agent readiness (44/100 against 22/100), domain rating (73/100 against 18/100), headcount (84 against 7), LinkedIn following (5,752 against 253). Luchs Security leads on our overall score (70/100 against 60/100), funding raised ($2.6B against $63.0M).
Read the full Intruder review and pricing or the Luchs Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Intruder alternatives we track.