Inthegame vs QuickCast
Inthegame vs QuickCast, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Inthegame is on 52/100 and QuickCast on 32/100.
Where each one leads
Inthegame
- our overall score: 52/100 against 32/100
- headcount: 26 against 3
- headcount growth: +10.4% against -8.0%
QuickCast
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 31/100
At a glance
| Measure | Inthegame | QuickCast |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Framework for interactive in-stream overlays for OTT platforms across all screens. | QuickCast empowers content creators to build, manage, distribute, and monetize FAST channels and custom-branded TV apps. |
| Category | Media, Gaming, TV, OTT | Media, Content, Creator Economy, Media Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Inthegame | QuickCast |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 26 | 3 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +10.4% | -8.0% |
| Total funding | $1.2M | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Bootstrapped |
| LinkedIn followers | 882 | 861 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Inthegame | QuickCast |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 32/100 |
| Traction | 45/100 | 6/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 27/100 | 29/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Inthegame | QuickCast |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
Inthegame vs QuickCast: common questions
Which is better, Inthegame or QuickCast?
On our 0-100 score Inthegame rates higher (52/100 against 32/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Inthegame and QuickCast compare on the numbers?
Inthegame leads on our overall score (52/100 against 32/100), headcount (26 against 3), headcount growth (+10.4% against -8.0%). QuickCast leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 31/100).
Read the full Inthegame review and pricing or the QuickCast review and pricing. You can also browse other Inthegame alternatives we track.