Internxt vs Tiger Technology
Internxt vs Tiger Technology, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Internxt is on 18/100 and Tiger Technology on 51/100.
Where each one leads
Internxt
- domain rating: 75/100 against 51/100
Tiger Technology
- our overall score: 51/100 against 18/100
- funding raised: $10.0M against $222K
At a glance
| Measure | Internxt | Tiger Technology |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Internxt is a European privacy-focused company offering encrypted cloud storage and a suite of privacy-oriented digital services. | On-premises-first hybrid cloud file data services for mission-critical workflows, enabling organizations to unlock the full value of unstructured enterprise data. |
| Category | Cloud Computing, Cybersecurity, Data Storage, Privacy | Data Storage, Cloud Computing, Hybrid Cloud, AI Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2004 |
| Headquarters | Valencia, Spain | Sofia, Bulgaria |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Internxt | Tiger Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 30 | Not published |
| Total funding | $222K | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Other Equity | Series A |
| Valuation | $36.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 9,498 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Internxt | Tiger Technology |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 18/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 39/100 | 35/100 |
| Team | Not published | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 16/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (55/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 75/100 | 51/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Internxt | Tiger Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Google Cloud |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Support stack | Intercom | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Internxt | Tiger Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 3 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“Stay away from Internxt. They mass emailed a bunch of lifetime users saying we need to empty our drives and slowly reupload our stuff because we are using too many resources. They deleted our post on their own forum and left no comment. I b”r/cloudstorage
Internxt vs Tiger Technology: common questions
Which is better, Internxt or Tiger Technology?
On our 0-100 score Tiger Technology rates higher (51/100 against 18/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Internxt and Tiger Technology compare on the numbers?
Internxt leads on domain rating (75/100 against 51/100). Tiger Technology leads on our overall score (51/100 against 18/100), funding raised ($10.0M against $222K).
What do real users say about Internxt and Tiger Technology?
Internxt: 0 positive and 3 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/cloudstorage.
Read the full Internxt review and pricing or the Tiger Technology review and pricing. You can also browse other Internxt alternatives we track.