Intakemd vs Phreesia
Intakemd vs Phreesia, compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Intakemd is on 7/100 and Phreesia on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Intakemd
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Phreesia
- our overall score: 61/100 against 7/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 43/100
At a glance
| Measure | Intakemd | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | IntakeMD provides an AI-powered platform to automate patient intake, streamline clinical workflows, and enhance patient engagement for healthcare providers. | A healthcare software platform automating patient check-in, scheduling, payments, and administrative tasks. |
| Category | HealthTech, MedTech, Clinical Workflow Automation, Patient Engagement | HealthTech, Healthcare IT, Patient Engagement, Healthcare Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B SaaS |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Not published | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Intakemd | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 1,532 |
| Total funding | Not published | $120M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 68,147 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Intakemd | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 7/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Intakemd | Phreesia |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Intakemd vs Phreesia: common questions
Which is better, Intakemd or Phreesia?
On our 0-100 score Phreesia rates higher (61/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Intakemd and Phreesia compare on the numbers?
Phreesia leads on our overall score (61/100 against 7/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 43/100).
Read the full Intakemd review and pricing or the Phreesia review and pricing. You can also browse other Intakemd alternatives we track.