InSoil vs SupPlant
InSoil vs SupPlant, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: InSoil is on 51/100 and SupPlant on 66/100.
Where each one leads
InSoil
- funding raised: $120M against $62.9M
SupPlant
- our overall score: 66/100 against 51/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 38/100 against 33/100
- LinkedIn following: 15,340 against 6,672
At a glance
| Measure | InSoil | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Climate finance company providing debt capital to agricultural SMEs adopting sustainable farming practices. | Agritech company providing AI-driven irrigation solutions for water-stressed agriculture, optimizing crop yields and conserving water. |
| Category | Climate Finance, Sustainable Agriculture, Regenerative Agriculture, Fintech | AgTech, Precision Agriculture, Water Management, Crop Optimization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | 2020 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Vilnius, Lithuania | Afula, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | InSoil | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 47 | 55 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -13.4% |
| Total funding | $120M | $62.9M |
| Latest round | credit facility | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $30.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,672 | 15,340 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | InSoil | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 75/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 33/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | InSoil | SupPlant |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
InSoil vs SupPlant: common questions
Which is better, InSoil or SupPlant?
On our 0-100 score SupPlant rates higher (66/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do InSoil and SupPlant compare on the numbers?
InSoil leads on funding raised ($120M against $62.9M). SupPlant leads on our overall score (66/100 against 51/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 41/100), domain rating (38/100 against 33/100), LinkedIn following (15,340 against 6,672).
Read the full InSoil review and pricing or the SupPlant review and pricing. You can also browse other InSoil alternatives we track.