Insitro vs Living Models
Insitro vs Living Models, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Insitro is on 62/100 and Living Models on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Insitro
- our overall score: 62/100 against 54/100
- funding raised: $243M against $7.0M
Living Models
- domain rating: 91/100 against 64/100
At a glance
| Measure | Insitro | Living Models |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Data-driven drug discovery and development company using machine learning and high-throughput biology. | Developing foundation models for biology trained on DNA, RNA, and multi-omics data. |
| Category | Healthcare, Drug Discovery, Drug Development, DNA | Artificial Intelligence, Biotechnology, Agriculture, Plant Science |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | South San Francisco, United States | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Insitro | Living Models |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 255 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +10.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $243M | $7.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| Valuation | $7.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 42,173 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Insitro | Living Models |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 62/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 34/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 62/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 64/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Insitro | Living Models |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Svelte, Tailwind CSS |
| Payments | Not detected | Stripe |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Insitro vs Living Models: common questions
Which is better, Insitro or Living Models?
On our 0-100 score Insitro rates higher (62/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Insitro and Living Models compare on the numbers?
Insitro leads on our overall score (62/100 against 54/100), funding raised ($243M against $7.0M). Living Models leads on domain rating (91/100 against 64/100).
Read the full Insitro review and pricing or the Living Models review and pricing. You can also browse other Insitro alternatives we track.