InScope vs Workiva
InScope vs Workiva, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: InScope is on 54/100 and Workiva on 29/100.
Where each one leads
InScope
- our overall score: 54/100 against 29/100
- agent readiness: 36/100 against 25/100
Workiva
- domain rating: 75/100 against 32/100
- headcount: 3,297 against 28
- LinkedIn following: 139,288 against 3,140
At a glance
| Measure | InScope | Workiva |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered financial reporting platform automating manual tasks for accounting firms and enterprises. | AI-powered platform unifying data and processes for finance, accounting, sustainability, risk, and audit teams. |
| Category | Fintech, Accounting Software, Artificial Intelligence, AI Financial Reporting | Enterprise Software, Sustainability, Risk Management, Audit |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2023 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Ames, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | InScope | Workiva |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 28 | 3,297 |
| Open roles | Not published | 72 |
| Total funding | $18.8M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,140 | 139,288 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | InScope | Workiva |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 29/100 |
| Traction | 36/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 6/100 | 35/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | F (25/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 32/100 | 75/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | InScope | Workiva |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | InScope | Workiva |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Generative AI for Reporting, Unified Assured Integrated Reporting, Comprehensive Data Management & Linking, Intelligent Productivity & Automation, Proactive Risk & Compliance Management, Scalable & Adaptable Platform |
InScope vs Workiva: common questions
Which is better, InScope or Workiva?
On our 0-100 score InScope rates higher (54/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do InScope and Workiva compare on the numbers?
InScope leads on our overall score (54/100 against 29/100), agent readiness (36/100 against 25/100). Workiva leads on domain rating (75/100 against 32/100), headcount (3,297 against 28), LinkedIn following (139,288 against 3,140).
Read the full InScope review and pricing or the Workiva review and pricing. You can also browse other InScope alternatives we track.