InnerEye vs SPREAD AI
InnerEye vs SPREAD AI, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: InnerEye is on 53/100 and SPREAD AI on 61/100.
Where each one leads
InnerEye
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
SPREAD AI
- our overall score: 61/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 38/100 against 24/100
- headcount: 98 against 23
- funding raised: $49.0M against $13.3M
- LinkedIn following: 7,487 against 2,077
At a glance
| Measure | InnerEye | SPREAD AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Fusing human intelligence with AI for trusted, complex decision-making and accelerated AI applicability. | AI-native data foundation for industrial companies to create 'Product Twins' and make faster, more confident decisions. |
| Category | Data Annotation, Data, Neurotech & HCI, AI Tools & Apps | Artificial Intelligence, Manufacturing, Industrial Tech, AI Foundation & Compute |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Herzliya, Israel | Berlin, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | InnerEye | SPREAD AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 23 | 98 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.7% | Not published |
| Total funding | $13.3M | $49.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,077 | 7,487 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | InnerEye | SPREAD AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 49/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 40/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 24/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | InnerEye | SPREAD AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight |
InnerEye vs SPREAD AI: common questions
Which is better, InnerEye or SPREAD AI?
On our 0-100 score SPREAD AI rates higher (61/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do InnerEye and SPREAD AI compare on the numbers?
SPREAD AI leads on our overall score (61/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 21/100), domain rating (38/100 against 24/100), headcount (98 against 23), funding raised ($49.0M against $13.3M), LinkedIn following (7,487 against 2,077).
Read the full InnerEye review and pricing or the SPREAD AI review and pricing. You can also browse other InnerEye alternatives we track.