Infraspeak vs NavVis
Infraspeak vs NavVis, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Infraspeak is on 47/100 and NavVis on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Infraspeak
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
NavVis
- our overall score: 66/100 against 47/100
- domain rating: 70/100 against 63/100
- headcount: 413 against 246
- LinkedIn following: 55,761 against 4,393
At a glance
| Measure | Infraspeak | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Infraspeak is a facilities management software startup. | NavVis provides a spatial twin platform for the built world, offering reality capture solutions and a browser-based SaaS platform for managing and utilizing spatial data. |
| Category | Facilities Management Software, Proptech, Enterprise Software, Workflow Automation | Spatial Computing, Digital Twins, Enterprise Software, Industrial Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Porto, Portugal | Munich, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Infraspeak | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 246 | 413 |
| Total funding | Not published | $73.2M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,393 | 55,761 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Infraspeak | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 47/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 63/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Infraspeak | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Matomo |
Infraspeak vs NavVis: common questions
Which is better, Infraspeak or NavVis?
On our 0-100 score NavVis rates higher (66/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Infraspeak and NavVis compare on the numbers?
NavVis leads on our overall score (66/100 against 47/100), domain rating (70/100 against 63/100), headcount (413 against 246), LinkedIn following (55,761 against 4,393).
Read the full Infraspeak review and pricing or the NavVis review and pricing. You can also browse other Infraspeak alternatives we track.