Infor vs Phocas
Infor vs Phocas, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Infor is on 64/100 and Phocas on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Infor
- agent readiness: 53/100 against 43/100
- domain rating: 82/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 22,270 against 334
- funding raised: $13B against $52.0M
- LinkedIn following: 914,967 against 38,687
Phocas
- headcount growth: +24.7% against -0.2%
At a glance
| Measure | Infor | Phocas |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global leader in cloud-based, industry-specific enterprise software solutions. | Integrated BI and FP&A platform for mid-market manufacturing, wholesale distribution, and retail. |
| Category | Cloud ERP, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Enterprise Software, Healthcare Software | Business Intelligence, Financial Planning & Analysis, Enterprise Software, Manufacturing Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2002 | 2001 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Atlanta, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Infor | Phocas |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 22,270 | 334 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -0.2% | +24.7% |
| Total funding | $13B | $52.0M |
| Latest round | Acquisition | Series B |
| Valuation | $13B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 914,967 | 38,687 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Infor | Phocas |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 20/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (53/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 82/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Infor | Phocas |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot, Discourse |
Infor vs Phocas: common questions
Which is better, Infor or Phocas?
On our 0-100 score Infor rates higher (64/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Infor and Phocas compare on the numbers?
Infor leads on agent readiness (53/100 against 43/100), domain rating (82/100 against 58/100), headcount (22,270 against 334), funding raised ($13B against $52.0M), LinkedIn following (914,967 against 38,687). Phocas leads on headcount growth (+24.7% against -0.2%).
Read the full Infor review and pricing or the Phocas review and pricing. You can also browse other Infor alternatives we track.