InEvent vs Pitch
InEvent vs Pitch, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: InEvent is on 34/100 and Pitch on 62/100.
Where each one leads
InEvent
- headcount: 97 against 74
Pitch
- our overall score: 62/100 against 34/100
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 40/100
- LinkedIn following: 37,679 against 18,885
At a glance
| Measure | InEvent | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Comprehensive event management software for large enterprises, offering end-to-end solutions for virtual, hybrid, and in-person events. | Collaborative pitch deck and presentation software for modern teams. |
| Category | Event Management Software, Virtual Events, Hybrid Events, Enterprise Software | Presentation Software, Collaboration Tools, Productivity Software, Sales Enablement |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tunis, Tunisia | Berlin, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | InEvent | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 97 | 74 |
| Total funding | Not published | $73.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 18,885 | 37,679 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | InEvent | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 34/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (57/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 81/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | InEvent | Pitch |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment, Linkedin Insight | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
InEvent vs Pitch: common questions
Which is better, InEvent or Pitch?
On our 0-100 score Pitch rates higher (62/100 against 34/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do InEvent and Pitch compare on the numbers?
InEvent leads on headcount (97 against 74). Pitch leads on our overall score (62/100 against 34/100), agent readiness (57/100 against 40/100), LinkedIn following (37,679 against 18,885).
Read the full InEvent review and pricing or the Pitch review and pricing. You can also browse other InEvent alternatives we track.