InEvent vs Mattermark
InEvent vs Mattermark, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: InEvent is on 34/100 and Mattermark on 60/100.
Where each one leads
InEvent
- headcount: 97 against 5
- LinkedIn following: 18,885 against 4,832
Mattermark
- our overall score: 60/100 against 34/100
At a glance
| Measure | InEvent | Mattermark |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Comprehensive event management software for large enterprises, offering end-to-end solutions for virtual, hybrid, and in-person events. | Sales intelligence and deal sourcing platform for investors, sales, and marketing professionals. |
| Category | Event Management Software, Virtual Events, Hybrid Events, Enterprise Software | Sales Intelligence, Lead Generation, Business Intelligence, Data Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tunis, Tunisia | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | InEvent | Mattermark |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 97 | 5 |
| Total funding | Not published | $15.8M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $42.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 18,885 | 4,832 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | InEvent | Mattermark |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 34/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 44/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 53/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (44/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | InEvent | Mattermark |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment, Linkedin Insight | Google Analytics 4, Segment, Hotjar |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
InEvent vs Mattermark: common questions
Which is better, InEvent or Mattermark?
On our 0-100 score Mattermark rates higher (60/100 against 34/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do InEvent and Mattermark compare on the numbers?
InEvent leads on headcount (97 against 5), LinkedIn following (18,885 against 4,832). Mattermark leads on our overall score (60/100 against 34/100).
Read the full InEvent review and pricing or the Mattermark review and pricing. You can also browse other InEvent alternatives we track.