inDrive vs Stonepeak
inDrive vs Stonepeak, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: inDrive is on 60/100 and Stonepeak on 68/100.
Where each one leads
inDrive
- domain rating: 71/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 6,000 against 600
Stonepeak
- our overall score: 68/100 against 60/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 37/100
- funding raised: $22B against $450M
At a glance
| Measure | inDrive | Stonepeak |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A global ride-hailing and on-demand delivery service operating on a peer-to-peer pricing model. | A leading alternative investment firm specializing in infrastructure and real assets. |
| Category | Ride-Sharing, Delivery, Logistics, On-Demand Services | Infrastructure, Real Assets, Digital Infrastructure, Energy Transition |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2012 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, United States | New York, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | inDrive | Stonepeak |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 6,000 | 600 |
| Total funding | $450M | $22B |
| Latest round | Debt Financing | Fundraising |
| Valuation | $1.2B | $15B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | inDrive | Stonepeak |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 18/100 | 14/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 88/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | inDrive | Stonepeak |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
inDrive vs Stonepeak: common questions
Which is better, inDrive or Stonepeak?
On our 0-100 score Stonepeak rates higher (68/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do inDrive and Stonepeak compare on the numbers?
inDrive leads on domain rating (71/100 against 58/100), headcount (6,000 against 600). Stonepeak leads on our overall score (68/100 against 60/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 37/100), funding raised ($22B against $450M).
Read the full inDrive review and pricing or the Stonepeak review and pricing. You can also browse other inDrive alternatives we track.