Indoor Robotics vs Uma
Indoor Robotics vs Uma, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Indoor Robotics is on 55/100 and Uma on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Indoor Robotics
- domain rating: 41/100 against 36/100
- LinkedIn following: 14,378 against 5,831
Uma
- our overall score: 58/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 29 against 8
- funding raised: $40.0M against $17.7M
At a glance
| Measure | Indoor Robotics | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Creator of Tando, an autonomous robot platform for everyday dull, dirty, and dangerous tasks. | Developing advanced physical AI and humanoid robots for industrial and domestic environments, focusing on real-world performance and learning through demonstration. |
| Category | Robotics, Security, Drones, Indoor | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Hardware |
| Founded | 2014 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Paris, France |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Indoor Robotics | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8 | 29 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -21.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $17.7M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 14,378 | 5,831 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Indoor Robotics | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 46/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 41/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Indoor Robotics | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | Indoor Robotics | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 1 positive, 0 negative across 1 thread | Not published |
“Indoor Robotics’ Tando™ drone fleet monitors autonomously MedOne’s data centres for safety and security purposes.”r/UAS
Indoor Robotics vs Uma: common questions
Which is better, Indoor Robotics or Uma?
On our 0-100 score Uma rates higher (58/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Indoor Robotics and Uma compare on the numbers?
Indoor Robotics leads on domain rating (41/100 against 36/100), LinkedIn following (14,378 against 5,831). Uma leads on our overall score (58/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 22/100), headcount (29 against 8), funding raised ($40.0M against $17.7M).
What do real users say about Indoor Robotics and Uma?
Indoor Robotics: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 1 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/UAS.
Read the full Indoor Robotics review and pricing or the Uma review and pricing. You can also browse other Indoor Robotics alternatives we track.