InCharge Energy vs Smappee
InCharge Energy vs Smappee, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: InCharge Energy is on 48/100 and Smappee on 55/100.
Where each one leads
InCharge Energy
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 41/100
- headcount: 243 against 115
- funding raised: $56.0M against $2.7M
Smappee
- our overall score: 55/100 against 48/100
- LinkedIn following: 24,554 against 17,632
At a glance
| Measure | InCharge Energy | Smappee |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provider of EV charging and energy solutions. | Smart energy monitoring and EV charging solutions for homes and businesses. |
| Category | Electric Vehicles, Energy, Sustainability, EV Charging | Energy & Climate Tech, Smart Grid, EV Charging, IoT |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Services | Hardware | software | platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Los Angeles, USA | Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | InCharge Energy | Smappee |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 243 | 115 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +16.6% |
| Total funding | $56.0M | $2.7M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,632 | 24,554 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | InCharge Energy | Smappee |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | InCharge Energy | Smappee |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
InCharge Energy vs Smappee: common questions
Which is better, InCharge Energy or Smappee?
On our 0-100 score Smappee rates higher (55/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do InCharge Energy and Smappee compare on the numbers?
InCharge Energy leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 41/100), headcount (243 against 115), funding raised ($56.0M against $2.7M). Smappee leads on our overall score (55/100 against 48/100), LinkedIn following (24,554 against 17,632).
Read the full InCharge Energy review and pricing or the Smappee review and pricing. You can also browse other InCharge Energy alternatives we track.