InCharge Energy vs Sitetracker
InCharge Energy vs Sitetracker, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: InCharge Energy is on 48/100 and Sitetracker on 61/100.
Where each one leads
InCharge Energy
- funding raised: $56.0M against $42.0M
Sitetracker
- our overall score: 61/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 426 against 243
- LinkedIn following: 98,888 against 17,632
At a glance
| Measure | InCharge Energy | Sitetracker |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Provider of EV charging and energy solutions. | Cloud-native platform for managing critical infrastructure asset lifecycles. |
| Category | Electric Vehicles, Energy, Sustainability, EV Charging | Infrastructure Management, Utilities, Renewables, EV Charging |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Los Angeles, USA | Berkeley, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | InCharge Energy | Sitetracker |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 243 | 426 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +17.7% |
| Total funding | $56.0M | $42.0M |
| Latest round | Funding Round | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,632 | 98,888 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | InCharge Energy | Sitetracker |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 48/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 57/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | InCharge Energy | Sitetracker |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | InCharge Energy | Sitetracker |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“$IBDRY Iberdrola Renews and Expands Sitetracker Use to Help Manage Massive EV Charging Station Deployment Goals.”r/EV_Trading_Community
InCharge Energy vs Sitetracker: common questions
Which is better, InCharge Energy or Sitetracker?
On our 0-100 score Sitetracker rates higher (61/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do InCharge Energy and Sitetracker compare on the numbers?
InCharge Energy leads on funding raised ($56.0M against $42.0M). Sitetracker leads on our overall score (61/100 against 48/100), headcount (426 against 243), LinkedIn following (98,888 against 17,632).
What do real users say about InCharge Energy and Sitetracker?
Sitetracker: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/EV_Trading_Community.
Read the full InCharge Energy review and pricing or the Sitetracker review and pricing. You can also browse other InCharge Energy alternatives we track.