In-Situ vs Planet Labs
In-Situ vs Planet Labs, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: In-Situ is on 29/100 and Planet Labs on 59/100.
Where each one leads
In-Situ
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Planet Labs
- our overall score: 59/100 against 29/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 57/100
- headcount: 1,717 against 215
- LinkedIn following: 160,601 against 11,413
At a glance
| Measure | In-Situ | Planet Labs |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Designs, manufactures, and sells environmental and process monitoring equipment and software. | Planet Labs PBC operates the largest fleet of Earth observation satellites, providing daily imagery and geospatial data for various industries. |
| Category | Environmental Monitoring, Water Quality Monitoring, Groundwater Monitoring, Surface Water Monitoring | SpaceTech, Satellite, Earth Observation, Geospatial Data |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | hardware | services | Platform |
| Founded | 1976 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Fort Collins, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | In-Situ | Planet Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 215 | 1,717 |
| Total funding | Not published | $730M |
| Latest round | Not published | SPAC |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.8B |
| LinkedIn followers | 11,413 | 160,601 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | In-Situ | Planet Labs |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 29/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 57/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | In-Situ | Planet Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
In-Situ vs Planet Labs: common questions
Which is better, In-Situ or Planet Labs?
On our 0-100 score Planet Labs rates higher (59/100 against 29/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do In-Situ and Planet Labs compare on the numbers?
Planet Labs leads on our overall score (59/100 against 29/100), domain rating (78/100 against 57/100), headcount (1,717 against 215), LinkedIn following (160,601 against 11,413).
Read the full In-Situ review and pricing or the Planet Labs review and pricing. You can also browse other In-Situ alternatives we track.