In-House Health vs ShiftMed
In-House Health vs ShiftMed, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: In-House Health is on 54/100 and ShiftMed on 64/100.
Where each one leads
In-House Health
- headcount growth: +117.0% against -4.6%
ShiftMed
- our overall score: 64/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 52/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 1,420 against 44
- funding raised: $292M against $15.4M
- LinkedIn following: 63,798 against 8,488
At a glance
| Measure | In-House Health | ShiftMed |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Healthcare workforce management platform optimizing clinical staffing and scheduling for hospitals. | Intelligent workforce management platform for healthcare to fill shift vacancies cost-effectively. |
| Category | Healthcare, Workforce Management, Hospital, HealthTech | HealthTech, HR Tech, Workforce Management, Staffing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Rockville, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | In-House Health | ShiftMed |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 44 | 1,420 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +117.0% | -4.6% |
| Total funding | $15.4M | $292M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,488 | 63,798 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | In-House Health | ShiftMed |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 22/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | In-House Health | ShiftMed |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
In-House Health vs ShiftMed: common questions
Which is better, In-House Health or ShiftMed?
On our 0-100 score ShiftMed rates higher (64/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do In-House Health and ShiftMed compare on the numbers?
In-House Health leads on headcount growth (+117.0% against -4.6%). ShiftMed leads on our overall score (64/100 against 54/100), domain rating (52/100 against 22/100), headcount (1,420 against 44), funding raised ($292M against $15.4M), LinkedIn following (63,798 against 8,488).
Read the full In-House Health review and pricing or the ShiftMed review and pricing. You can also browse other In-House Health alternatives we track.