Import.io vs Scrapinghub (now Zyte)
Import.io vs Scrapinghub (now Zyte), compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Import.io is on 49/100 and Scrapinghub (now Zyte) on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Import.io
- funding raised: $33.0M against $4.5M
Scrapinghub (now Zyte)
- our overall score: 60/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 44/100
At a glance
| Measure | Import.io | Scrapinghub (now Zyte) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Platform for extracting and integrating web data into business processes. | Provides a full-stack web scraping API and data extraction services for businesses. |
| Category | Web Data Integration, Data Extraction, Web Scraping, Business Intelligence | Web Scraping, Data Extraction, Data Services, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Dublin, Ireland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Import.io | Scrapinghub (now Zyte) |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 235 |
| Total funding | $33.0M | $4.5M |
| Latest round | Series B | Debt Financing |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 73,719 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Import.io | Scrapinghub (now Zyte) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 38/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 70/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Import.io | Scrapinghub (now Zyte) |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, PostHog, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
| Support stack | Freshdesk | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Import.io vs Scrapinghub (now Zyte): common questions
Which is better, Import.io or Scrapinghub (now Zyte)?
On our 0-100 score Scrapinghub (now Zyte) rates higher (60/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Import.io and Scrapinghub (now Zyte) compare on the numbers?
Import.io leads on funding raised ($33.0M against $4.5M). Scrapinghub (now Zyte) leads on our overall score (60/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (55/100 against 44/100).
Read the full Import.io review and pricing or the Scrapinghub (now Zyte) review and pricing. You can also browse other Import.io alternatives we track.