Imperva vs Zimperium
Imperva vs Zimperium, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Imperva is on 67/100 and Zimperium on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Imperva
- our overall score: 67/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 75/100
- headcount: 1,700 against 283
- funding raised: $75.7M against $60.0M
- LinkedIn following: 75,709 against 36,698
Zimperium
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Imperva | Zimperium |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Imperva is a cybersecurity leader protecting critical applications, APIs, and data for organizations globally with an integrated security approach. | Zimperium provides enterprise mobile threat defense, protecting Android and iOS devices from advanced mobile threats using behavior-based analytics. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Application Security, Data Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Mobile Security, Endpoint Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2002 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | San Mateo, United States | Dallas, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Imperva | Zimperium |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,700 | 283 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +41.8% |
| Total funding | $75.7M | $60.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series D |
| Valuation | $10.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 75,709 | 36,698 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Imperva | Zimperium |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 57/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 84/100 | 75/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Imperva | Zimperium |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | Imperva | Zimperium |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 1 negative across 4 threads |
“a recent Zimperium zLabs study analyzed 800 free VPN apps. findings included outdated OpenSSL libraries still vulnerable to Heartbleed (a bug from 2014), apps requesting permissions to read system logs (effectively keyloggers), microphone a”r/YouShouldKnow
Imperva vs Zimperium: common questions
Which is better, Imperva or Zimperium?
On our 0-100 score Imperva rates higher (67/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Imperva and Zimperium compare on the numbers?
Imperva leads on our overall score (67/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 40/100), domain rating (84/100 against 75/100), headcount (1,700 against 283), funding raised ($75.7M against $60.0M), LinkedIn following (75,709 against 36,698).
What do real users say about Imperva and Zimperium?
Zimperium: 2 positive and 1 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/YouShouldKnow.
Read the full Imperva review and pricing or the Zimperium review and pricing. You can also browse other Imperva alternatives we track.