Imperva vs ThreatX
Imperva vs ThreatX, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Imperva is on 67/100 and ThreatX on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Imperva
- our overall score: 67/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 45/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 1,700 against 14
- funding raised: $75.7M against $53.7M
- LinkedIn following: 75,709 against 9,199
ThreatX
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Imperva | ThreatX |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Imperva is a cybersecurity leader protecting critical applications, APIs, and data for organizations globally with an integrated security approach. | Cloud-native WAAP solution for API and application security, providing real-time visibility and protection against evolving threats. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Application Security, Data Security | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, API Security, Application Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2002 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Mateo, United States | Denver, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Imperva | ThreatX |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,700 | 14 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -52.2% |
| Total funding | $75.7M | $53.7M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | $10.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 75,709 | 9,199 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Imperva | ThreatX |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 50/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 57/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 84/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Imperva | ThreatX |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot, Zendesk |
Imperva vs ThreatX: common questions
Which is better, Imperva or ThreatX?
On our 0-100 score Imperva rates higher (67/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Imperva and ThreatX compare on the numbers?
Imperva leads on our overall score (67/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 45/100), domain rating (84/100 against 55/100), headcount (1,700 against 14), funding raised ($75.7M against $53.7M), LinkedIn following (75,709 against 9,199).
Read the full Imperva review and pricing or the ThreatX review and pricing. You can also browse other Imperva alternatives we track.