Imperva vs Sweet Security
Imperva vs Sweet Security, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Imperva is on 67/100 and Sweet Security on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Imperva
- our overall score: 67/100 against 63/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 47/100
- headcount: 1,700 against 119
- LinkedIn following: 75,709 against 8,963
Sweet Security
- funding raised: $128M against $75.7M
At a glance
| Measure | Imperva | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Imperva is a cybersecurity leader protecting critical applications, APIs, and data for organizations globally with an integrated security approach. | Cloud runtime security suite defending cloud workloads with offensive and defensive expertise. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Application Security, Data Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, DevSecOps, AppSec |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2002 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Mateo, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Imperva | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,700 | 119 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +126.9% |
| Total funding | $75.7M | $128M |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| Valuation | $10.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 75,709 | 8,963 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Imperva | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 57/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 84/100 | 47/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Imperva | Sweet Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, PostHog |
Imperva vs Sweet Security: common questions
Which is better, Imperva or Sweet Security?
On our 0-100 score Imperva rates higher (67/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Imperva and Sweet Security compare on the numbers?
Imperva leads on our overall score (67/100 against 63/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 39/100), domain rating (84/100 against 47/100), headcount (1,700 against 119), LinkedIn following (75,709 against 8,963). Sweet Security leads on funding raised ($128M against $75.7M).
Read the full Imperva review and pricing or the Sweet Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Imperva alternatives we track.