Imperva vs Reblaze
Imperva vs Reblaze, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Imperva is on 67/100 and Reblaze on 38/100.
Where each one leads
Imperva
- our overall score: 67/100 against 38/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 43/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 73/100
- headcount: 1,700 against 114
- LinkedIn following: 75,709 against 7,076
Reblaze
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Imperva | Reblaze |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Imperva is a cybersecurity leader protecting critical applications, APIs, and data for organizations globally with an integrated security approach. | Cloud-based, fully managed WAF, DDoS, and API security solution for websites and web applications. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Application Security, Data Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, API, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2002 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | San Mateo, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Imperva | Reblaze |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,700 | 114 |
| Total funding | $75.7M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| Valuation | $10.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 75,709 | 7,076 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Imperva | Reblaze |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 38/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 20/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 57/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 84/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Imperva | Reblaze |
|---|---|---|
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Imperva | Reblaze |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“ShieldEye - Web Security Detection Extension. 🛡️ ShieldEye - Web Security Detection Extension 🎯 Overview ShieldEye is an open-source browser extension that detects and analyzes anti-bot solutions, CAPTCHA services, and security mechanisms”r/webscraping
Imperva vs Reblaze: common questions
Which is better, Imperva or Reblaze?
On our 0-100 score Imperva rates higher (67/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Imperva and Reblaze compare on the numbers?
Imperva leads on our overall score (67/100 against 38/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 43/100), domain rating (84/100 against 73/100), headcount (1,700 against 114), LinkedIn following (75,709 against 7,076).
What do real users say about Imperva and Reblaze?
Reblaze: 1 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/webscraping.
Read the full Imperva review and pricing or the Reblaze review and pricing. You can also browse other Imperva alternatives we track.