Imperva vs Quilr
Imperva vs Quilr, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Imperva is on 67/100 and Quilr on 51/100.
Where each one leads
Imperva
- our overall score: 67/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 1,700 against 70
- funding raised: $75.7M against $4.0M
- LinkedIn following: 75,709 against 6,661
Quilr
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Imperva | Quilr |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Imperva is a cybersecurity leader protecting critical applications, APIs, and data for organizations globally with an integrated security approach. | Quilr uses AI agents and a Service-as-Software platform to prevent human-related security breaches. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Application Security, Data Security | Agentic AI, Cybersecurity, AI Agent, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2002 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Mateo, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Imperva | Quilr |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,700 | 70 |
| Total funding | $75.7M | $4.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| Valuation | $10.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 75,709 | 6,661 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Imperva | Quilr |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 57/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 84/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Imperva | Quilr |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Imperva | Quilr |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Safe AI Adoption, Frictionless Data Sharing, SaaS Identity Protection, Behavioral Risk Management, Self-Resolution of Alerts |
Imperva vs Quilr: common questions
Which is better, Imperva or Quilr?
On our 0-100 score Imperva rates higher (67/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Imperva and Quilr compare on the numbers?
Imperva leads on our overall score (67/100 against 51/100), domain rating (84/100 against 31/100), headcount (1,700 against 70), funding raised ($75.7M against $4.0M), LinkedIn following (75,709 against 6,661).
Read the full Imperva review and pricing or the Quilr review and pricing. You can also browse other Imperva alternatives we track.