Imperva vs PlainID
Imperva vs PlainID, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Imperva is on 67/100 and PlainID on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Imperva
- our overall score: 67/100 against 63/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 1,700 against 93
- LinkedIn following: 75,709 against 23,482
PlainID
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Imperva | PlainID |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Imperva is a cybersecurity leader protecting critical applications, APIs, and data for organizations globally with an integrated security approach. | Enterprise authorization platform for data, APIs, and AI, powered by Policy Based Access Control (PBAC). |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Application Security, Data Security | Enterprise, Authorization, Identity Management, Identity & Access |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2002 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Mateo, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Imperva | PlainID |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,700 | 93 |
| Total funding | $75.7M | $88.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series C |
| Valuation | $10.0M | $300M |
| LinkedIn followers | 75,709 | 23,482 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Imperva | PlainID |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 57/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 84/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Imperva | PlainID |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Jquery, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Segment |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Imperva vs PlainID: common questions
Which is better, Imperva or PlainID?
On our 0-100 score Imperva rates higher (67/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Imperva and PlainID compare on the numbers?
Imperva leads on our overall score (67/100 against 63/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 39/100), domain rating (84/100 against 55/100), headcount (1,700 against 93), LinkedIn following (75,709 against 23,482).
Read the full Imperva review and pricing or the PlainID review and pricing. You can also browse other Imperva alternatives we track.