Imperva vs Kasada
Imperva vs Kasada, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Imperva is on 67/100 and Kasada on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Imperva
- our overall score: 67/100 against 58/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 65/100
- headcount: 1,700 against 120
- LinkedIn following: 75,709 against 6,860
Kasada
- agent readiness: 65/100 against 50/100
At a glance
| Measure | Imperva | Kasada |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Imperva is a cybersecurity leader protecting critical applications, APIs, and data for organizations globally with an integrated security approach. | Kasada protects websites, mobile apps, and APIs from automated attacks with real-time threat detection. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Application Security, Data Security | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, API Security, Bot Mitigation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2002 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Mateo, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Imperva | Kasada |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,700 | 120 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -15.4% |
| Total funding | $75.7M | $84.9M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| Valuation | $10.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 75,709 | 6,860 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Imperva | Kasada |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 57/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | C (65/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 84/100 | 65/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Imperva | Kasada |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
What users say
| Measure | Imperva | Kasada |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 1 negative across 2 threads |
“Bypass Kasada. Hi fellow web scrapers, I wrote a script in Playwright (Python) that automates a login process on https://sportsbet.com.au . This script runs headless and works perfectly fine on my Windows host machine. However, when I run t”r/webscraping
Imperva vs Kasada: common questions
Which is better, Imperva or Kasada?
On our 0-100 score Imperva rates higher (67/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Imperva and Kasada compare on the numbers?
Imperva leads on our overall score (67/100 against 58/100), domain rating (84/100 against 65/100), headcount (1,700 against 120), LinkedIn following (75,709 against 6,860). Kasada leads on agent readiness (65/100 against 50/100).
What do real users say about Imperva and Kasada?
Kasada: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/webscraping.
Read the full Imperva review and pricing or the Kasada review and pricing. You can also browse other Imperva alternatives we track.