Impact vs Laurel
Impact vs Laurel, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Impact is on 54/100 and Laurel on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Impact
- domain rating: 88/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 3,506 against 285
- LinkedIn following: 98,937 against 8,772
Laurel
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Impact | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | impact.com offers a unified platform for managing affiliates, influencers, and referrals, streamlining partnerships for brands & publishers. | AI-powered work intelligence platform for operational and profitability insights from time data. |
| Category | EdTech, Learning Management System, Professional Development, AI-Powered Learning | EdTech, AI-Powered Learning, Professional Development, Personalized Learning |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Impact | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3,506 | 285 |
| Total funding | $120M | $100M |
| Latest round | Bridge | Not published |
| Valuation | $750M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 98,937 | 8,772 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Impact | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 28/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (52/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 88/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Impact | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Linkedin Insight, Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | Not detected | Intercom, HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Impact vs Laurel: common questions
Which is better, Impact or Laurel?
On our 0-100 score Laurel rates higher (55/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Impact and Laurel compare on the numbers?
Impact leads on domain rating (88/100 against 55/100), headcount (3,506 against 285), LinkedIn following (98,937 against 8,772).
Read the full Impact review and pricing or the Laurel review and pricing. You can also browse other Impact alternatives we track.